Sunday, January 5, 2014

David Hulme's Group Continues to Implode From Members Leaving Because of Abuse



Of all the various splinter groups of Armstrongism, David Hulme's small group is the most secretive.  Many have found that a rather strange stance to to take considering he is supposed to have the pure gospel that is vital for a hurting world.  However, the entire world knows nothing about Hulme, his message, or his church.  Even his magazine VISION, is a failure.

Silenced has extensive news about the rapid disintegration of the smallest of the small COG splinters: Hulme's Group Implodes.

Silenced notes:

What started as mere whispers two years ago already has risen to a thunderous collapse over issues of ministerial abuse, ineffective media efforts, British Israelism and David Hulme’s authoritarianism.

...members and ministers alike have grown weary of abusive authoritarianism within the COG.

A new group has already split off and call themselves The Father's Call. 

Brian Orchard, Peter Nathan, Matt King, Bill Hutchison, Bob Rodzaj, Cliff Veal, Marshall Stiver, Stephen Elliott, Steve Andrews, Ted Budge, are just a few of the ministers that have rebelled against Hulme.

Just wondering....

Why Reunification SOON!  (Formerly "Now")
This announcement presents many reasons that reunification is drawing near. There is much PROOF!
Let’s recall again. Previous announcements explained why Haggai 1:15 describes this event as happening “in the second year of Darius the king.” For those who believe this date pertains to the Persian King Darius (who lived over 2,500 years ago), remember that the modern Zerubbabel is also described as the “son of Shealtiel” and Joshua as the “son of Josedech.” Let’s reason together. The modern TYPES of these two men are obviously NOT sons of these two fathers of long ago. The Bible is obviously speaking in code about what are two modern leaders. Mr. Armstrong knew the ancient Zerubbabel having been born to a man named Shealtiel had nothing to do with his prophetic fulfillment of this role. The same would be true of the modern Joshua regarding the irrelevancy of the ancient figure Josedech.

-.. .- ...- . / .. / .- -- / -. --- - / ... .--. . .- -.- .. -. --. / - --- / -.-- --- ..- / .. -. / .- -. -.-- / .-- .- -.-- / -- ..- -.-. .... / .-.. . ... ... / .. -. / -.-. --- -.. .

-.-- --- ..- / .... .- ...- . / .-. . .- .-.. .-.. -.-- / -- . ... ... . -.. / ..- .--. / - .... . / -... --- --- -.- / --- ..-. / .... .- --. --. .- .. / -.. .- ...- .

Similarly, the description of the timing of fulfillment must also be in code...."

Apostle Pack says that God is obviously speaking in code.  Does any God have to speak in "code"?  Why would He do that?  I'm thinking that the Apostle wants God to speak in code so he can decipher the code as he wishes.  Frankly it is ridiculous theology to believe such    baloney and those who accept this code talking God are being foolish beyond belief.

. -. -.. / --- ..-. / - .-. .- -. ... -- .. ... ... .. --- -.

http://morsecode.scphillips.com/jtranslator.html